In some rare but welcome news, the British economy was given a boost in the last few days, as popcorn sales have skyrocketed across the nation.

That can only mean one thing, the much awaited Covid enquiry theatre show was in town, and the crowd weren’t to be disappointed.

Lessons must be learned from the intentional societal closure, livelihood destruction and mass pharmaceutical needling of the masses, but what would those lessons be?

Ohh, you could cut the atmosphere with a PCR test.

I mean, it’s all very exciting and all that, and I do love me a theatrical production. I was once a drama student, after all.

But there is this little part of me that feels somewhat uncomfortable with the establishment marking their own homework.

I get the impression that letting someone grade their own project, would be, lets say, leaving the result open to manipulation?

But then if that were the case, you would expect the UK Government to give itself an A+ wouldn’t you?

“We have conducted an inquiry and concluded that faced with an unprecedented threat, our Government and its institution’s actions were exemplary. Well done all… hip hip hooray… case closed, pay rises and book deals all round, let’s all go to Nandos”.

I’m not sure that kind of blatant whitewash would whitewash with the masses, especially those that lost loved ones, and had their lives irreparably damaged in one form or another.

So you have to give them something.

You have to admit some errors and some ‘could have done betters’ to satisfy the public.

Maybe even throw them the heads of some low level political fruit, to really make it look like whilst you have indeed marked your own school book, you’ve done it with honesty and integrity.

Because no-one does honesty and integrity quite like the parasite class.

But why just leave it at that? Why not flip the tables in your favour?

See, if you had whitewashed the inquiry, and said everything was great, then at best, if you did manage to get the masses to accept that whitewashed result, then you’d be leaving yourself open and free to implement similar lockdown measures in the future.

You would have set a precedent for the manufactured pandemics of tomorrow, and that’s cool I guess. It’s certainly better than your inquiry finding that lockdowns and mandates were an absolute disaster, and did so much more harm than good, even if you believe the official ‘Covid’ narrative, which of course I don’t.

Because if they had admitted what their draconian impositions did, then they would be taking them off the table for further down the road.

When the next manufactured crisis, whether it be a pandemic, mass terrorism, war with Russia, climate catastrophe, civil unrest or whatever, comes along, and you attempt to impose a lockdown, you’d be pointed straight back to the results of your own inquiry.

“Remember you did this before, and you found it was an absolute catastrophe!”

Ah, yes. That would make for quite the awkward conversation, wouldn’t it?

So you don’t do that, and you don’t even give yourself an A+, as tempting as that maybe, because you know that you have an opportunity to make the situation work in your favour, and not only lay the groundwork for similar lockdowns in the future, but instead, you say you should have locked down harder, and locked down faster, and if you had you’d have saved twenty three thousand lives. This builds the foundations on which you can stack the justification for even harsher, more draconian life destroying lockdowns in the future.

Great idea, and do you know the really really great part?

You’ll love this.

Read more – https://ickonic.com/Read/r/1377