Language Selection

Get healthy now with MedBeds!
Click here to book your session

Protect your whole family with Orgo-Life® Quantum MedBed Energy Technology® devices.

Advertising by Adpathway

         

 Advertising by Adpathway

Keir Starmer’s Questionable Child Protection History

3 months ago 65

PROTECT YOUR DNA WITH QUANTUM TECHNOLOGY

Orgo-Life the new way to the future

  Advertising by Adpathway

We are told that the UK government is led by Prime Minister Keir Starmer and that he is a “decent man”. After more than 82% of the electorate did not vote for either Starmer or the Labour party, his government secured a whopping 170+ seat majority. It can do pretty much anything it likes while it keeps its backbenchers in line.

The current Labour government, under Starmer, has not only failed to protect children when it could, but it has actively opposed others’ attempts to do so. Such morally repugnant behaviour is nothing new for the Labour Party.

Labour grandees Patricia Hewitt, Harriet Harman and Jack Dromey were all prominent in the National Council for Civil Liberties while it was affiliated to the child-rape advocacy group the Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE). At the time, Harmen’s activities included arguing against a proposed ban on child pornography, and Hewitt’s public conduct included suggestions that objective morality couldn’t either be defined or established. After their links were exposed, these Labour heavyweights all denied that they were influenced by or connected in any way to PIE.

In 1984, Conservative MP Geoffrey Dickens handed a dossier, reportedly containing evidence suggesting a Westminster VIP paedophile ring and other child-rape allegations, to then Tory Home Secretary Leon Brittan, in whose custody it promptly vanished. Nothing happened, and the whole muddled fudge ping-ponged around the denial sphere until, in 2014, it was resurrected. Labour MP Simon Danczuk and Labour Deputy Leader Tom Watson used the dossier as a political football to score goals against the Tories.

During the subsequent party political shenanigans, it was conceded that at least 114 files contained in the original dossier had disappeared. The head of the Civil Service, Mark Sedwill, said there was nothing “sinister” about the destruction of evidence.

Having reportedly read what remained of the dossier, Watson told parliament:

[There is] clear intelligence suggesting a powerful paedophile network linked to Parliament and No. 10.

The Tory government responded by announcing a future official “independent public inquiry”, no less. In reality, UK independent public inquiries ceased to exist a decade earlier when Tony Blair’s Labour government enacted the 2005 Inquiries Act. Under the Act, inquiry “independence” effectively means the government has total control. Unsurprisingly, the resultant IICSA inquiry ensured that the “clear intelligence” evaporated again as any meaningful investigation was avoided like the plague.

For example, in a 1995 interview for the BBC, the former Tory chief whip Tim Fortescue—who served in Edward Heath’s government—explained how the party leadership would cover up MPs’ paedophile crimes in order to blackmail them.

Read More – Keir Starmer’s Questionable Child Protection History

Read Entire Article

         

        

Start the new Vibrations with a Medbed Franchise today!  

Protect your whole family with Quantum Orgo-Life® devices

  Advertising by Adpathway